A question that comes up in almost every procedure
One of the most common confusions in Indian nurse recognition concerns the role of the employment contract. Many providers believe a complete German employment contract must be in place before the recognition application can be filed. Many candidates believe they can only start their recognition procedure once they hold a German employment contract.
Both are wrong. For the deficit notice, German recognition authorities generally accept alternative evidence of a concrete tie to a German provider — employment commitments, ZSBA confirmations, declarations of interest. Which variant applies in which constellation isn't always clear-cut. This article orders the three main alternatives, describes their formal requirements, and names the practice preferences of individual federal states.
What the deficit notice actually requires
The deficit notice is issued by the competent state authority after assessment of equivalence and names the substantial differences identified between the foreign and German nursing training. For issuance the authority requires:
- evidence of professional qualification (diploma, curriculum, marksheets, activity descriptions)
- identity evidence and police clearance
- language evidence (generally B2)
- evidence of a concretely intended exercise of the profession in Germany
The last point is the decisive one. "Concretely intended" is typically not interpreted so strictly that an employment contract has to exist. A credible and verifiable intention to work in Germany suffices — and in the great majority of federal states, the three alternatives described below are enough for this.
Alternative 1: Employment commitment (Einstellungszusage)
The employment commitment is formally the strongest alternative. It's a binding written declaration by a specific provider to employ the nurse after successful recognition.
Content of a typical employment commitment:
- Name and address of the provider
- Personal data of the candidate
- Planned position (function, ward, weekly hours)
- Planned start date or "after successful recognition"
- Intended classification (e.g. TVöD-P 7) and gross salary
- Statement that the commitment is conditional on successful recognition
Binding effect: The employment commitment doesn't legally carry the same binding force as an employment contract, but it carries significant weight in authority practice. Providers should be aware of its signalling effect — an employment commitment later withdrawn damages not just the specific procedure but the relationship with the recruiter and future candidates.
Acceptance: Accepted as evidence in all federal states.
Alternative 2: ZSBA evidence
The ZSBA (Zentrale Servicestelle Berufsanerkennung) is an institution of the Federal Employment Agency that supports recognition procedures and advises candidates abroad. Anyone using the ZSBA path receives a certificate of ongoing support — and this can serve as alternative evidence in many recognition procedures.
Advantage: The ZSBA path can be used even when no concrete provider has been found yet. The candidate can start the recognition procedure in a "neutral" constellation and only later commit to a specific provider.
Limitation: Not all federal states accept ZSBA evidence as sole proof of "concretely intended exercise of the profession." Particularly for candidates very early in the procedure, some state authorities require additional evidence.
Acceptance: Federal states with established ZSBA practice (especially Baden-Württemberg, Hesse, Bavaria) accept the evidence broadly. In other federal states, parallel submission of an employment commitment or declaration of interest is recommended.
Alternative 3: Declaration of interest
The declaration of interest is the formally weakest alternative. It's a written statement by a provider expressing "fundamental interest" in employing the candidate — without the binding effect of an employment commitment.
Content of a typical declaration of interest:
- Name and address of the provider
- Personal data of the candidate
- Statement of fundamental interest in employment
- Reference to preliminary conversations or profile assessment
- No concrete position, no concrete salary, no concrete start date
When it makes sense: when the provider knows the nurse but the procedure is still in an early phase and the concrete position is only fixed later (e.g. because a pipeline with several open positions is being built).
Acceptance: In some federal states a pure declaration of interest isn't enough — the authority requires an employment commitment or ZSBA evidence. In other federal states, the declaration of interest in combination with a detailed profile description is accepted.
Federal state preferences from practice
Even though the formal legal basis is the same Nursing Professions Act across all federal states, authority preferences differ:
- Baden-Württemberg, Hesse, Bavaria: ZSBA evidence broadly accepted; employment commitment additionally welcomed.
- North Rhine-Westphalia: Employment commitment standard; ZSBA accepted in some regional government districts, not solely sufficient in others.
- Berlin and Hamburg: Employment commitment strongly preferred; declaration of interest only in special constellations.
- Other federal states: Predominantly employment commitment as standard path; ZSBA path less established.
These preferences shift when authorities change personnel or issue new guidance. Before every filing, a phone call to the competent body pays off — five minutes of clarification saves three weeks of completion requests.
Practical recommendations
From our daily practice, four recommendations emerge:
When a concrete provider is fixed: employment commitment. Fastest, accepted in all federal states without issue.
When the provider is still searching but the pipeline should be filled: declaration of interest combined with ZSBA support. The procedure stays steerable without locking the candidate to a single provider.
When the candidate is very early in the sourcing process: start with ZSBA support, transition to employment commitment once the specific provider is fixed.
Never: Submit oral promises or non-binding emails as authority evidence. They don't meet the formal requirements and lead to queries that delay the procedure by weeks.
How we work
The overall flow of the recognition procedure, into which all three alternatives are embedded, is in the Recognition procedure guide 2026. The acceleration paths (§81a, ZAG-PuG) that can additionally come into play are in the comparison Recognition vs. §81a vs. ZAG-PuG.
Next step
If you need a template for employment commitment or declaration of interest for a specific candidate — in a form proven in the relevant federal states — send a short email to vishnu.marthala@indofachkraft.de. We'll send the templates as editable documents.
*This article does not constitute legal advice.*
IndoFachkraft UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Vishnu Marthala, Geschäftsführer
Im Biegel 12, 71522 Backnang
Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 803907
Steuernummer 51047/27615 (Finanzamt Backnang)
IHK Stuttgart Mitgl.-Nr. 2854625
Tel.: +49 176 41791626
E-Mail: vishnu.marthala@indofachkraft.de
Web: www.indofachkraft.de