A confusion that costs HR departments money
In personnel files and correspondence with recognition authorities, two paragraphs of the Nursing Professions Act (PflBG) keep appearing: §2 PflBG and §40 PflBG. The two sound interchangeable but aren't. Confusing them risks misclassification on the pay scale, non-billable working time, or, in the worst case, illegal deployment as a nurse before the legal basis is fully in place.
This article explains what the two paragraphs regulate, how they relate to each other — and what operational consequences arise for facilities.
§2 PflBG: the professional title
§2 of the Nursing Professions Act regulates the professional title of Pflegefachfrau / Pflegefachmann. It specifies who may use this title in Germany — and under what conditions.
The professional title is protected in Germany. Anyone calling themselves a Pflegefachfrau or Pflegefachmann must meet the requirements of the PflBG — either through training completed in Germany or through recognition of professional qualification acquired abroad as equivalent. Recognition is therefore the act by which a foreign qualification is declared equivalent to German training.
Important: §2 speaks of the title. It doesn't speak of the practice. A nurse with recognised qualification under §2 may carry the title — but isn't yet automatically entitled to independent practice in Germany.
§40 PflBG: the permit to practise
§40 PflBG regulates the permit to practise the nursing profession. This permit is issued by the competent state authority — and is precondition for the nurse to work independently as a Pflegefachfrau / Pflegefachmann in Germany.
The permit under §40 requires:
- recognition of professional qualification under §2 (or training completed in Germany)
- personal reliability (generally evidenced by police clearance)
- health fitness to practise
- sufficient German language skills for safe practice
Only with the permit under §40 may a nurse carry out nursing-professional acts in Germany independently — that is, take on reserved tasks, work in treatment care, create legally binding nursing documentation, and be classified in tariff tables like TVöD-P 7 (or higher).
The difference in practice: three constellations
Three constellations make the difference operationally tangible:
Constellation A: Recognition granted, permit not yet
The authority has completed the equivalence assessment and granted the nurse recognition under §2 PflBG — either fully or with conditions now met. The formal permit to practise under §40 PflBG is still pending because, for instance, the police clearance hasn't arrived or the language exam is missing.
Operational consequence: During this phase the nurse may not be deployed as a nursing professional. Deployment only as a nursing assistant is possible insofar as residence law permits; classification in TVöD-P 7 is not permitted.
Constellation B: Deficit notice with running adaptation course
The nurse has received a deficit notice and is in the adaptation course. §2 recognition isn't yet complete; §40 permit either.
Operational consequence: During the adaptation course, most federal states have a special arrangement under which the nurse may participate in nursing-professional acts under supervision — but not independently. The exact form varies; the competent authority usually names it in the deficit notice or accompanying letter.
Constellation C: Both notices in place
Both recognition under §2 and permit under §40 are granted.
Operational consequence: Full deployment as Pflegefachfrau / Pflegefachmann. Classification in the relevant pay group, reserved tasks, independent documentation. Only now are all employment-law and social-security prerequisites met.
Consequences for personnel deployment and payroll
Three concrete consequences for practice follow from this separation:
Classification. Classification in a nursing-professional pay group (e.g. TVöD-P 7 ff.) requires the permit under §40, not just recognition under §2. Anyone classifying earlier creates an employment-law-challengeable construction and risks back-payment claims in audits.
Reserved tasks. The reserved tasks defined in the Nursing Professions Act and Nursing Training and Examination Ordinance (nursing-process management, nursing diagnostics, patient education) may only be carried out independently by nurses with §40 permit. A nurse with §2 recognition but no §40 permit may assist, but not decide independently.
Documentation legal-relevance. Nursing documentation that must hold legally binding force towards care insurance funds, MDK / MD, and in liability cases before courts requires the permit under §40. Anyone having documentations signed before permit issuance risks objections and subsequent recovery.
What HR departments should operationally do about it
Three routines reduce confusion risk:
- File both notices separately in the personnel record. Recognition under §2 and permit under §40 are two separate documents — they often arrive at different times and must each be evidenceable.
- Tie the classification workflow to the §40 permit. Classification in a nursing-professional pay group should only be unlocked when the §40 notice is in the personnel record in copy.
- Mark in the duty roster. In the first months after arrival the same employee can have different deployment rights depending on procedural status. Clear marking in the duty roster prevents a ward manager inadvertently delegating a reserved task.
How we work
The overall procedural flow of recognition — into which the §2 and §40 prerequisites are embedded — is in the Recognition procedure guide 2026. What acceleration paths exist for visa issuance, running in parallel with the §2 and §40 review, is in the comparison Recognition vs. §81a vs. ZAG-PuG.
Next step
If you'd like a concrete personnel case reviewed — recognition status, classification question, reserved-task eligibility — send a short email to vishnu.marthala@indofachkraft.de. We'll respond within one working day.
*This article does not constitute legal advice.*
IndoFachkraft UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Vishnu Marthala, Geschäftsführer
Im Biegel 12, 71522 Backnang
Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 803907
Steuernummer 51047/27615 (Finanzamt Backnang)
IHK Stuttgart Mitgl.-Nr. 2854625
Tel.: +49 176 41791626
E-Mail: vishnu.marthala@indofachkraft.de
Web: www.indofachkraft.de